jackwener commented on code in PR #4013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4013#discussion_r1008713111


##########
datafusion/core/src/physical_plan/planner.rs:
##########
@@ -1013,7 +1013,10 @@ impl DefaultPhysicalPlanner {
                         LogicalPlan::TableScan(..) => {
                             self.create_initial_plan(input, 
session_state).await
                         }
-                        _ => Err(DataFusionError::Plan("SubqueryAlias should 
only wrap TableScan".to_string()))
+                        LogicalPlan::Filter(..) => {
+                            self.create_initial_plan(input, 
session_state).await
+                        }
+                        _ => Err(DataFusionError::Plan("SubqueryAlias should 
only wrap TableScan or Filter".to_string()))

Review Comment:
   I may get your point. You hope to unify alias in the same place
   Current, alias can exist two part.
   - SubqueryAlias
   - Projection Alias
   This implementation is different from `Spark`
   
   `Spark Subquery` don't include alias.
   ```scala
   case class Subquery(child: LogicalPlan, correlated: Boolean) extends 
OrderPreservingUnaryNode {
     override def output: Seq[Attribute] = child.output
     override protected def withNewChildInternal(newChild: LogicalPlan): 
Subquery =
       copy(child = newChild)
   }
   ```
   
   I think your thought is reasonable. We shouldn't put alias in multiple place.
   
   We have two choices:
   - Just SubqueryAlias can contains alias
   - like spark, Subquery don't contain alias
   
   I also agree with former, which is more suitable for the current situation 
of datafusion
   
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to