lidavidm commented on PR #82: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/82#issuecomment-1341506092
> I have never disliked unions more; however, I believe that nanoarrow has emerged better for having dealt with them properly here. There is still implementing the `ArrowArrayGetXXXX()` functions (one for another PR, I think) Heh. I suppose it would at least be more consistent if they did have the validity bitmap. Or if we only supported 'sparse' unions, they could just have been a special case of structs. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
