Jefffrey opened a new pull request, #4661:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4661

   # Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   Closes #3658.
   
   # Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   # What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   During CSV schema inference, instead of reading entire object/file into 
memory before taking as many rows as configured to infer the schema, will 
instead stream in the CSV (using helper method from object_store) which feeds 
into newline_delimited_stream to produce the stream of CSV rows, which can be 
read as needed instead of needing entire file in memory.
   
   Certain adjustments needed for this:
   
   - Only read header for first chunk (if header present)
   - As inferring chunks of the file separately, must merge the inferred 
datatypes of these chunks together akin to what 
`arrow::csv::reader::infer_reader_schema(...)` already does
   - If has header row, and in first chunk only the header row was read (i.e. 
no data rows) then must ignore the datatype (as will default to Utf8 which can 
cause issues with merging the schemas of the chunks)
   
   # Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   
   CSV schema inference logic covered by existing tests.
   
   (Could add benchmark since this is meant to be performance improvement?)
   
   # Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api 
change` label.
   -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to