h-vetinari commented on issue #20272: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/20272#issuecomment-1381194930
> Yes, it should be. Unfortunately, it might require bumping all AWS-related dependencies, or perhaps even adding some of them. cc @kou AFAIU, the aws-sdk-cpp bundles everything you need (for AWS), I don't think anything else depends on it. > @js8544 Certainly not. It's more a matter of finding out (or discovering) what has or has not changed in the AWS SDK build procedures between 1.8.x and 1.9.x. Biggest (only?) issue that blocked upgrading to 1.9 was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15141 due to https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-cpp/issues/1809. That has been fixed through https://github.com/awslabs/aws-c-io/pull/515, and once we had a 1.9 build with that (conda-forge unbundles the sdk into separate parts, so it's a bit of a different situation), we were able to [bump](https://github.com/conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock/issues/918) to 1.9. I have been [thinking](https://github.com/conda-forge/aws-sdk-cpp-feedstock/issues/662) about bumping the conda-forge feedstock to 1.10, but we haven't actually done that yet, and there's been a couple [changes](https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-cpp#version-110-is-now-available) being advertised in the upstream readme. I think we'd have to test whether this works. The good thing is that the arrow CI also contains a working simile of the conda-feedstock CI, and it would be easy to test this for whatever PR is in the works by replacing the version pins in the CI yaml files [here](https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/tasks/conda-recipes/.ci_support). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
