nealrichardson commented on issue #33702: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33702#issuecomment-1408814537
> The "just update boost" fix turned out to be more complicated than I expected How so? I don't see problems mentioned on https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33890 Up to y'all (ultimately Nic, since they'll be the one receiving the CRAN emails) if you want to submit without the boost upgrade. `std::unary_function`, what BDR suggested was the problem for some, only appears in one place I can find in the boost we use, and it is conditional on a check for its existence: https://github.com/boostorg/container_hash/blob/171c012d4723c5e93cc7cffe42919afdf8b27dfa/include/boost/container_hash/hash.hpp#L131 It's reasonable to submit without the upgrade, and if it still fails, respond that we ran on latest clang16 before submission and it passed so we believed the issue to be resolved. Downside is that I doubt we would get any extra time to fix, so I think it will still need to be resolved by Feb 16. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
