pitrou commented on code in PR #33925:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33925#discussion_r1094382233


##########
docs/source/format/CanonicalExtensions.rst:
##########
@@ -72,4 +72,30 @@ same rules as laid out above, and provide backwards 
compatibility guarantees.
 Official List
 =============
 
-No canonical extension types have been standardized yet.
+Fixed shape tensor
+==================
+
+* Extension name: `arrow.fixed_shape_tensor`.
+
+* The storage type of the extension: ``FixedSizeList`` where:
+
+  * **value_type** is the data type of individual tensors and
+    is an instance of ``pyarrow.DataType`` or ``pyarrow.Field``.
+  * **list_size** is the product of all the elements in tensor shape.
+
+* Extension type parameters:
+
+  * **value_type** = Arrow DataType of the tensor elements
+  * **shape** = shape of the contained tensors as a tuple
+  * **is_row_major** = boolean indicating the order of elements

Review Comment:
   > But those dimension names only make sense if you _assume_ the data is in 
logical row-major order, no?
   
   The logical row-major order is given by the dimension names, so this is a 
bit circular?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to