mingmwang commented on code in PR #4691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/4691#discussion_r1095464959


##########
datafusion/core/tests/sql/window.rs:
##########
@@ -1748,17 +1748,20 @@ async fn test_window_partition_by_order_by() -> 
Result<()> {
 
     let msg = format!("Creating logical plan for '{}'", sql);
     let dataframe = ctx.sql(sql).await.expect(&msg);
-    let physical_plan = dataframe.create_physical_plan().await.unwrap();
+    let physical_plan = dataframe.create_physical_plan().await?;
     let formatted = displayable(physical_plan.as_ref()).indent().to_string();
-    // Only 1 SortExec was added
     let expected = {
         vec![
-            "ProjectionExec: expr=[SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4) PARTITION BY 
[aggregate_test_100.c1, aggregate_test_100.c2] ORDER BY [aggregate_test_100.c2 
ASC NULLS LAST] ROWS BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING@0 as 
SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4), COUNT(UInt8(1)) PARTITION BY 
[aggregate_test_100.c1] ORDER BY [aggregate_test_100.c2 ASC NULLS LAST] ROWS 
BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING@1 as COUNT(UInt8(1))]",
-            "  WindowAggExec: wdw=[SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4): Ok(Field { 
name: \"SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4)\", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, 
dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }), frame: WindowFrame { 
units: Rows, start_bound: Preceding(UInt64(1)), end_bound: Following(UInt64(1)) 
}, COUNT(UInt8(1)): Ok(Field { name: \"COUNT(UInt8(1))\", data_type: Int64, 
nullable: true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }), frame: 
WindowFrame { units: Rows, start_bound: Preceding(UInt64(1)), end_bound: 
Following(UInt64(1)) }]",
-            "    SortExec: [c1@0 ASC NULLS LAST,c2@1 ASC NULLS LAST]",
+            "ProjectionExec: expr=[SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4) PARTITION BY 
[aggregate_test_100.c1, aggregate_test_100.c2] ORDER BY [aggregate_test_100.c2 
ASC NULLS LAST] ROWS BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING@1 as 
SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4), COUNT(UInt8(1)) PARTITION BY 
[aggregate_test_100.c1] ORDER BY [aggregate_test_100.c2 ASC NULLS LAST] ROWS 
BETWEEN 1 PRECEDING AND 1 FOLLOWING@0 as COUNT(UInt8(1))]",
+            "  WindowAggExec: wdw=[COUNT(UInt8(1)): Ok(Field { name: 
\"COUNT(UInt8(1))\", data_type: Int64, nullable: true, dict_id: 0, 
dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }), frame: WindowFrame { units: Rows, 
start_bound: Preceding(UInt64(1)), end_bound: Following(UInt64(1)) }]",
+            "    SortExec: [c1@1 ASC NULLS LAST,c2@2 ASC NULLS LAST]",
             "      CoalesceBatchesExec: target_batch_size=4096",
-            "        RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([Column { name: 
\"c1\", index: 0 }], 2)",
-            "          RepartitionExec: partitioning=RoundRobinBatch(2)",
+            "        RepartitionExec: partitioning=Hash([Column { name: 
\"c1\", index: 1 }], 2)",
+            "          WindowAggExec: wdw=[SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4): 
Ok(Field { name: \"SUM(aggregate_test_100.c4)\", data_type: Int64, nullable: 
true, dict_id: 0, dict_is_ordered: false, metadata: {} }), frame: WindowFrame { 
units: Rows, start_bound: Preceding(UInt64(1)), end_bound: Following(UInt64(1)) 
}]",
+            "            SortExec: [c1@0 ASC NULLS LAST,c2@1 ASC NULLS LAST]",

Review Comment:
   Ok, I find out the place.  Could you please explain why we need to differ 
the sort keys are from `PARTITION BY` or `ORDER BY `? This change cause the 
window expressions are
   evaluated in two `WindowAggExec`.
   
   ```rust
   /// (expr, "is the SortExpr for window (either comes from PARTITION BY or 
ORDER BY columns)")
   /// if bool is true SortExpr comes from `PARTITION BY` column, if false 
comes from `ORDER BY` column
   type WindowSortKey = Vec<(Expr, bool)>;
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to