mustafasrepo commented on code in PR #5171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/5171#discussion_r1098266601


##########
datafusion/core/src/physical_optimizer/sort_enforcement.rs:
##########
@@ -102,34 +134,170 @@ impl TreeNodeRewritable for PlanWithCorrespondingSort {
                 .collect::<Result<Vec<_>>>()?;
             let children_plans = children_requirements
                 .iter()
-                .map(|elem| elem.plan.clone())
-                .collect::<Vec<_>>();
+                .map(|item| item.plan.clone())
+                .collect();
             let sort_onwards = children_requirements
-                .iter()
-                .map(|item| {
-                    let onwards = &item.sort_onwards;
-                    if !onwards.is_empty() {
-                        let flags = item.plan.maintains_input_order();
-                        // `onwards` starts from sort introducing executor(e.g 
`SortExec`, `SortPreservingMergeExec`) till the current executor
-                        // if the executors in between maintain input 
ordering. If we are at
-                        // the beginning both `SortExec` and 
`SortPreservingMergeExec` doesn't maintain ordering(they introduce ordering).
-                        // However, we want to propagate them above anyway.
-                        for (maintains, element) in 
flags.into_iter().zip(onwards.iter())
-                        {
-                            if (maintains || is_sort(&item.plan)) && 
!element.is_empty() {
-                                return element.clone();
+                .into_iter()
+                .enumerate()
+                .map(|(idx, item)| {
+                    let plan = &item.plan;
+                    // Leaves of the `sort_onwards` tree are sort-introducing 
operators
+                    // (e.g `SortExec`, `SortPreservingMergeExec`). This tree 
collects
+                    // all the intermediate executors that maintain this 
ordering. If
+                    // we just saw a sort-introducing operator, we reset the 
tree and
+                    // start accumulating.
+                    if is_sort(plan) {
+                        return Some(ExecTree {
+                            idx,
+                            plan: item.plan,
+                            children: vec![],
+                        });
+                    } else if is_limit(plan) {
+                        // There is no sort linkage for this path, it starts 
at a limit.
+                        return None;
+                    }
+                    let is_spm = is_sort_preserving_merge(plan);
+                    let is_union = plan.as_any().is::<UnionExec>();
+                    // If the executor is a `UnionExec`, and it has an output 
ordering;
+                    // then it at least partially maintains some child's 
output ordering.
+                    // Therefore, we propagate this information upwards.
+                    let partially_maintains =
+                        is_union && plan.output_ordering().is_some();

Review Comment:
   I have changed code according to your suggestion. It now uses properties of 
the plan. Thanks for the suggestion



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to