paleolimbot commented on code in PR #107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/107#discussion_r1105206747
##########
src/nanoarrow/schema_test.cc:
##########
@@ -139,6 +139,12 @@ TEST(SchemaTest, SchemaTestInitNestedMap) {
NANOARROW_OK);
ASSERT_EQ(ArrowSchemaSetType(schema.children[0]->children[1],
NANOARROW_TYPE_STRING),
NANOARROW_OK);
+ ASSERT_STREQ("entries", schema.children[0]->name);
+ ASSERT_STREQ("key", schema.children[0]->children[0]->name);
+ ASSERT_STREQ("value", schema.children[0]->children[1]->name);
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(schema.children[0]->flags & ARROW_FLAG_NULLABLE);
+ ASSERT_FALSE(schema.children[0]->children[0]->flags & ARROW_FLAG_NULLABLE);
Review Comment:
Is there a reason why these are `ASSERT`s and not `EXPECT`s? The other
expectations I've written also use `XXX(actual, expected)` (but I never looked
up which was correct or if there is a correct way to do it...that's just how
R's testing works).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
