alamb commented on pull request #8660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8660#issuecomment-728393610
@yordan-pavlov When I ran the benchmark locally again on my laptop:
```
cargo run --release --bin tpch -- --iterations 3 --path
/Users/alamb/Software/tpch_data/SF10-parquet-64 --format parquet --query 1
--batch-size 4096
```
benchmarks on this branch (fd77fd6a4ee4705f8d25436c6a8dee3beb834941)
```
Running benchmarks with the following options: TpchOpt { query: 1, debug:
false, iterations: 3, concurrency: 2, batch_size: 4096, path:
"/Users/alamb/Software/tpch_data/SF10-parquet-64", file_format: "parquet",
mem_table: false }
Query 1 iteration 0 took 5371 ms
Query 1 iteration 1 took 6121 ms
Query 1 iteration 2 took 6160 ms
alamb@ip-192-168-0-133 benchmarks %
```
benchmark on master oe5fce7f6a70c370c758b133f025444c98cdd305d
```
Running benchmarks with the following options: TpchOpt { query: 1, debug:
false, iterations: 3, concurrency: 2, batch_size: 4096, path:
"/Users/alamb/Software/tpch_data/SF10-parquet-64", file_format: "parquet",
mem_table: false }
Query 1 iteration 0 took 7640 ms
Query 1 iteration 1 took 7808 ms
Query 1 iteration 2 took 7765 ms
```
So it seems to me the the performance improved a bit. I am second guessing
my performance setup here - it is with a laptop and I do wonder if my CPU is
being throttled.
Regardless, I think this is good enough results!
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
