icexelloss commented on code in PR #34311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/34311#discussion_r1126951325
##########
cpp/src/arrow/compute/kernels/hash_aggregate_test.cc:
##########
@@ -301,53 +426,184 @@ Result<Datum> GroupByTest(const std::vector<Datum>&
arguments,
{t_agg.function, t_agg.options, "agg_" + ToChars(idx),
t_agg.function});
idx = idx + 1;
}
- return RunGroupBy(arguments, keys, internal_aggregates, use_threads);
+ return group_by(arguments, keys, segment_keys, internal_aggregates,
use_threads,
+ /*naive=*/false);
}
-} // namespace
+Result<Datum> GroupByTest(GroupByFunction group_by, const std::vector<Datum>&
arguments,
+ const std::vector<Datum>& keys,
+ const std::vector<TestAggregate>& aggregates,
+ bool use_threads) {
+ return GroupByTest(group_by, arguments, keys, {}, aggregates, use_threads);
+}
-TEST(Grouper, SupportedKeys) {
- ASSERT_OK(Grouper::Make({boolean()}));
+template <typename GroupClass>
Review Comment:
I think this templating probably causes more confusion/complexity than it is
worth. There is also no guarantee that Grouper and RowSegmenter will always
support the same set of datatypes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
