zeroshade commented on issue #34657:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/34657#issuecomment-1479854043

   hmm, I think it's perfectly reasonable to implement this. Do you think this 
is better than the `ValueString` idea? ie: instead of adding a `ValueString` 
method to just extension arrays, you add `UntypedValue` to all arrays and then 
extension arrays can override this to produce something with a `String()` 
method or just let it go to the underlying storage array?
   
   Also, perhaps we can name it something like `InterfaceValue(i int)` or 
something else. I don't think I like `UntypedValue` but then again, I can't 
think of something "better" at the moment, so we can go with `UntypedValue` if 
you don't have any better suggestions.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to