alamb commented on code in PR #6007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/6007#discussion_r1167172294


##########
datafusion/physical-expr/src/intervals/interval_aritmetic.rs:
##########
@@ -324,25 +507,24 @@ mod tests {
                 Some(999),
                 Some(1000),
             ),
-            (None, Some(1000), Some(1000), None, Some(1000), Some(1000)), // 
singleton
             (None, None, None, None, None, None),
         ];
 
         for case in possible_cases {
             assert_eq!(
-                Interval {
-                    lower: ScalarValue::Int64(case.0),
-                    upper: ScalarValue::Int64(case.1)
-                }
-                .intersect(&Interval {
-                    lower: ScalarValue::Int64(case.2),
-                    upper: ScalarValue::Int64(case.3)
-                })?
+                Interval::new(
+                    IntervalBound::new(ScalarValue::Int64(case.0), true),
+                    IntervalBound::new(ScalarValue::Int64(case.1), true),
+                )
+                .intersect(&Interval::new(
+                    IntervalBound::new(ScalarValue::Int64(case.2), true),
+                    IntervalBound::new(ScalarValue::Int64(case.3), true)
+                ))?
                 .unwrap(),
-                Interval {
-                    lower: ScalarValue::Int64(case.4),
-                    upper: ScalarValue::Int64(case.5)
-                }
+                Interval::new(
+                    IntervalBound::new(ScalarValue::Int64(case.4), true),
+                    IntervalBound::new(ScalarValue::Int64(case.5), true),
+                )

Review Comment:
   I can't help thinking while reading this PR that all this repetition 
obscures somewhat the intent of the test. I wonder if there is some way to 
write this code like
   
   ```
               assert_eq!(
                   Interval::new(
                     IntervalBound::open(case.0), IntervalBound::open(case.1)
                   )
                   .intersect(&Interval::new(
                     IntervalBound::open(case.2), IntervalBound::open(case.3))
                    )?
                   .unwrap(),
                   Interval::new(
                       IntervalBound::open(case.4),
                       IntervalBound::open(case.5 ),
                   )
   ```
   
   Or maybe even
   
   
   ```
               assert_eq!(
                   Interval::both_open(case.0, case.1)
                   .intersect(&Interval::both_open(case.2, case.3)))?
                   Interval::both_open(case.4, case.5 ),
              )
   ```
   
   Even if you just made a helper for tests, I think reducing the boilder plate 
would significantly improve the readability of these tests



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to