tustvold commented on code in PR #6154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/6154#discussion_r1180284294


##########
datafusion/core/src/physical_plan/memory.rs:
##########
@@ -327,24 +326,20 @@ impl ExecutionPlan for MemoryWriteExec {
     ) -> Result<SendableRecordBatchStream> {
         let batch_count = self.batches.len();
         let data = self.input.execute(partition, context)?;
-        if batch_count >= self.input.output_partitioning().partition_count() {
-            // If the number of input partitions matches the number of 
MemTable partitions,
-            // use a lightweight implementation that doesn't utilize as many 
locks.
-            let table_partition = self.batches[partition].clone();
-            Ok(Box::pin(MemorySinkOneToOneStream::try_new(
-                table_partition,
-                data,
-                self.schema.clone(),
-            )?))
-        } else {
-            // Otherwise, use the locked implementation.
-            let table_partition = self.batches[partition % 
batch_count].clone();
-            Ok(Box::pin(MemorySinkStream::try_new(
-                table_partition,
-                data,
-                self.schema.clone(),
-            )?))
-        }
+        let schema = self.schema.clone();
+        let state = (data, self.batches[partition % batch_count].clone());
+
+        let stream = futures::stream::unfold(state, |mut state| async move {

Review Comment:
   [unfold](https://docs.rs/futures/latest/futures/stream/fn.unfold.html) is 
incredibly useful. The only downside is you can't name the type, at least until 
we get existential types



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to