felipecrv commented on issue #35581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35581#issuecomment-1554722053

   Scary. And as I thought more about my proposal of deleting the copy ctor of 
`ArraySpan`, I realized that completely defeats the point of having a 
non-owning span type.
   
   If we really care about small buffers being cheap, we should instead 
consider changing the `Buffer` class to have an optimization similar to the 
small-string optimization that `std::string` does. That can be made safe by 
correct implementation of the move/copy constructors of `Buffer` 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to