lidavidm commented on PR #757: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/757#issuecomment-1587696623
Frankly given https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/320 and https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/621 I'm wondering if we shouldn't retire GetObjects in favor of non-nested alternatives. The original design perhaps favored DuckDB and its ability to query nested data too much. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
