felipecrv commented on code in PR #35769:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35769#discussion_r1236014819
##########
go/arrow/array/binary.go:
##########
@@ -318,6 +319,116 @@ func arrayEqualLargeBinary(left, right *LargeBinary) bool
{
return true
}
+type ViewLike interface {
+ arrow.Array
+ ValueHeader(int) *arrow.StringHeader
+}
+
+type BinaryView struct {
+ array
+ values []arrow.StringHeader
+ dataBuffers []*memory.Buffer
+}
+
+func NewBinaryViewData(data arrow.ArrayData) *BinaryView {
+ a := &BinaryView{}
+ a.refCount = 1
+ a.setData(data.(*Data))
+ return a
+}
+
+func (a *BinaryView) setData(data *Data) {
+ if len(data.buffers) < 2 {
+ panic("len(data.buffers) < 2")
+ }
+ a.array.setData(data)
+
+ if valueData := data.buffers[1]; valueData != nil {
+ a.values =
arrow.StringHeaderTraits.CastFromBytes(valueData.Bytes())
+ }
+
+ a.dataBuffers = data.buffers[2:]
+}
+
+func (a *BinaryView) ValueHeader(i int) *arrow.StringHeader {
+ if i < 0 || i >= a.array.data.length {
+ panic("arrow/array: index out of range")
+ }
+ return &a.values[a.array.data.offset+i]
+}
+
+func (a *BinaryView) Value(i int) []byte {
Review Comment:
This is a concern present everywhere in Arrow though, so a comment here
could be understood as implying that places without a comment like this allow
buffers to be mutated.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
