jorisvandenbossche commented on PR #36314:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36314#issuecomment-1611070229

   Hmm, so the failing tests point out an issue with this approach: we have 
some keywords to control the conversion, notably `timestamp_as_object` in this 
case. 
   And if the user passes this, and we just call `pandas_dtype.__from_arrow__` 
nonetheless, this keyword gets ignored.
   
   But, we also already have this problem, as this already happens for the 
ChunkedArray conversion:
   
   ```
   In [8]: from datetime import datetime
      ...: import pyarrow as pa
      ...: 
      ...: arr = pa.array([datetime(2001, 1, 1)], pa.timestamp("s", 
tz="America/New_York"))
      ...: table = pa.table({'a': arr})
   
   In [9]: arr.to_pandas(timestamp_as_object=True)
   Out[9]: 
   0    2000-12-31 19:00:00-05:00
   dtype: object
   
   In [10]: table["a"].to_pandas(timestamp_as_object=True)
   Out[10]: 
   0   2000-12-31 19:00:00-05:00
   Name: a, dtype: datetime64[ns, America/New_York]
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to