westonpace opened a new pull request, #36650:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36650

   ### Rationale for this change
   
   Files in modules which do not depend on the acero module should not 
reference files inside the acero module.
   
   ### What changes are included in this PR?
   
   There were no changes to the body of any functions.  I simply moved 
functions around so that the acero include was no longer needed.  There were 
some conflicts that arose between the class `bit_util` and the namespace 
`bit_util` and so I got rid of the class in favor of the namespace as that is 
more similar to how we handle `bit_util` elsewhere.
   
   ### Are these changes tested?
   
   Sort of.  I would like to add an AVX2 CI system as well.  I'm not confident 
any of the CI builds are building with AVX2 enabled.  Also, even if we have an 
AVX2 CI system it would not have caught this issue since the code was only 
needed definitions from the acero header and was not relying on any actual 
compiled symbols.  However, I think setting up tests to catch this sort of 
invalid include are beyond the scope of this PR.
   
   ### Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   No.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to