westonpace commented on issue #36665: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/36665#issuecomment-1634638475
There is very little (by design) query planning so you are correct that the former would be more efficient. I think this is a reasonably addition to pyarrow. The execution internals (Acero) should be able to handle this currently (this would just be two project nodes). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
