conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #36647: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36647#issuecomment-1646781746
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit c9fbc88eccd56fda27d6bc655732ed17388317ac. There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression: - Commit Run on `ec2-m5-4xlarge-us-east-2` at [2023-07-13 13:25:57Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/2cee4346a0eb4340b5a44783427cb3e9...edfa4fca804040ed977c302ffceb2ff5/) - [engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-06, scale_factor=10](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064aff1720a87ced80002ad6e571a23a...064b003c4a37779d800069e15596b4e2) - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-07-23 05:35:29Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/c0d29323c6f5410daaeb5bec05050087...cc28691c79a14862a7b2f50a4eec263d/) - [engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-20, scale_factor=1](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064bcaa5c13a71408000965ae9708436...064bcdc07ec17512800065bc8a7b7763) - and 1 more (see the report linked below) The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/15266501127) has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
