conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #36895:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36895#issuecomment-1663074122

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have 
been run so far on merge-commit 7c0451c71ef68840b4642e53857b522160c075f4.
   
   There were 2 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `arm64-t4g-linux-compute` at [2023-07-26 
20:59:41Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/78eb3b4b86c048c5ba17de3da184b525...3bd4cbbe7975499a9e698927b23b5891/)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, 
memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-22, 
scale_factor=1](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064c192fba6f79238000db0cba685ed6...064c197638e97338800004ecf2b971ef)
   
   - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-08-02 
20:16:22Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/ad5a3542e4104e00a2a1e3ac2732813b...c270409e0df24244b1329b422ac79918/)
     - [`dataframe-to-table` (Python) with 
dataset=type_integers](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064caa029d687ed88000a22beedf4447...064cabad812b76eb8000e469866e872c)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/15571167899) 
has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives 
for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to