felipecrv commented on PR #37202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/37202#issuecomment-1682230227

   > But this discussion can also regard other implementations, I think it 
would be useful to discuss on the ML.
   
   The discussion is needed if we decide to put the definition of empty value 
(a better terminology than "default value" I used above) on the spec. My 
current position is that validation should be relaxed and not assume other 
implementations are producing non-null fields inside null structs.
   
   For instance, I believe that a compute kernel, in the official 
implementation or other implementations, should be allowed to skip producing 
empty values inside of null structs. This can be a very meaningful improvement 
for structs with a large number of fields.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to