genemerewether commented on issue #259: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/issues/259#issuecomment-1729467864
Thanks for the update! I would be happy with partial functionality in C and part in C++ if that simplifies things without too much scope creep for nanoarrow. On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:26 AM Dewey Dunnington ***@***.***> wrote: > Just a note that I *have* been thinking about this, but it will probably > not make the next release (0.3.0, probably next week). It is a challenge to > represent that type of object in C and I'm not sure that nanoarrow should > invent how that should be done (plus the challenge of dealing with name > references when there is no built-in hash map implementation in C). > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/issues/259#issuecomment-1729004877>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDSJSL4U7FTPUPWJTI3ZPLX3PT3LANCNFSM6AAAAAA2NVWXZ4> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
