fansehep commented on PR #4906: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/4906#issuecomment-1753208636
> I think I would prefer that we add a new `with_has_headers` and deprecate the old `has_headers` then once this has percolated through a couple of releases we can potentially repurpose the `has_headers` to be an accessor.我想我更愿意添加一个新的 `with_has_headers` 并弃用旧的 `has_headers` ，然后一旦它渗透到几个版本中，我们就可以重新调整 `has_headers` 的用途成为一个访问者。 > I think I would prefer that we add a new `with_has_headers` and deprecate the old `has_headers` then once this has percolated through a couple of releases we can potentially repurpose the `has_headers` to be an accessor. I think `is_has_headers` name is better than `get_has_headers`. Maybe we can now deprecate of it? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
