likun666661 opened a new pull request, #38790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38790

   <!--
   Thanks for opening a pull request!
   If this is your first pull request you can find detailed information on how 
   to contribute here:
     * [New Contributor's 
Guide](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/guide/step_by_step/pr_lifecycle.html#reviews-and-merge-of-the-pull-request)
     * [Contributing 
Overview](https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/overview.html)
   
   
   If this is not a [minor 
PR](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#Minor-Fixes). 
Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? 
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose
   
   Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the 
[Openness](http://theapacheway.com/open/#:~:text=Openness%20allows%20new%20users%20the,must%20happen%20in%20the%20open.)
 of the Apache Arrow project.
   
   Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?
   
       GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}
   
   or
   
       MINOR: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}
   
   In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:
   
       PARQUET-${JIRA_ISSUE_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}
   
   -->
   
   ### Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   In Gandiva, it has been observed that the tool caches compiled expressions. 
However, when using the expression cache, Gandiva takes into account the 
schema, expr->ToString, and specific parameters. Nevertheless, in 
llvm_generator.cc, Gandiva still traverses the expressions to generate LLVM IR 
code and then produces specific JIT functions. Considering that llvm_generator 
traverses expressions and calculates the memory start positions of fields 
involved in the computation, we can further enhance Gandiva's caching mechanism.
   
   Specifically, we can exclude the influence of the schema. Simultaneously, we 
can also exclude the field names' information involved in the expression 
computation. For example, for a schema {f0:int32, f1:int32} with an expression 
add(f0, f1), we can cache it initially. Then, for a schema {a0:int32, a1:int32, 
a2:int32} with an expression add(a1, a2), it should not require recompilation; 
it can directly reuse the JIT function generated by the expression {f0:int32, 
f1:int32}, add(f0, f1).
   
   ### What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   This PR primarily alters the construction of the cache key and makes 
modifications to the schema validation in both the projector and filter. It 
also adjusts the validation of fields in expr_validator. Additionally, a 
ToCacheKeyString function has been added to each node. This PR mainly focuses 
on these areas.
   
   ### Are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   Yes,these changes are tested.
   
   ### Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   No.
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   -->
   
   <!--
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please uncomment the line 
below and explain which changes are breaking.
   -->
   <!-- **This PR includes breaking changes to public APIs.** -->
   
   <!--
   Please uncomment the line below (and provide explanation) if the changes fix 
either (a) a security vulnerability, (b) a bug that caused incorrect or invalid 
data to be produced, or (c) a bug that causes a crash (even when the API 
contract is upheld). We use this to highlight fixes to issues that may affect 
users without their knowledge. For this reason, fixing bugs that cause errors 
don't count, since those are usually obvious.
   -->
   <!-- **This PR contains a "Critical Fix".** -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to