alamb commented on pull request #9211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9211#issuecomment-762194974


   I agree that the Rust arrow implementation is likely to need several more 
months of non trivial changes to get to a point where we want to be more 
constrained with backwards compatibility. 
   
   Given the subtlety of this change, if this bug also exists in the 2.0.0 
release of arrow I don't think we should merge it in 3.0.0 at the last minute. 
If it was introduced in 3.0.0 I do think we should merge it to avoid releasing 
a regression. 
   
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to