conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #38888: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38888#issuecomment-1837403019
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit db69b67a55ae797a5e3665b963bf7fc6d38cdff5. There was 1 benchmark result with an error: - Commit Run on `arm64-m6g-linux-compute` at [2023-12-03 01:33:08Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/abee1678033d4151b221a5d3ece45ddb...028a03dbd25d437daabdc3c9433f3c9c/) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-15, scale_factor=10](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0656bf94731a75138000cafde22d7535) There were 2 benchmark results indicating a performance regression: - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-12-02 14:48:04Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/a45d1c49abfc44108d694377dc006d72...7153283a30a440f2b5695462c604eff8/) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-11, scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/0656b31fa17c7f2b8000583365cf6c6e...0656b595f69b733180008dd79bc9348e) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-11, scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/0656b32048e0735e8000abe046dc0f70...0656b596cfa377578000b29cbf9a6c06) The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/19257865919) has more details. It also includes information about 2 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
