nbenn commented on issue #1397: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/1397#issuecomment-1867748134
@paleolimbot from where I stand, what you proposed with `adbc_statement_bind_by_name()` would make many of my problems go away here. Trying to solve my problem specifically, we might also re-consider what names the parameter schema should have exactly. Does it make sense that parameter names come with "placeholder indicators"? If the schema were to change, the only extra information I'd need is whether named parameter are supported by the back-end or not. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
