comphead commented on code in PR #8622:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/8622#discussion_r1435421181


##########
datafusion/physical-expr/src/array_expressions.rs:
##########
@@ -883,6 +899,10 @@ pub fn array_append(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> 
{
 
 /// Array_sort SQL function
 pub fn array_sort(args: &[ArrayRef]) -> Result<ArrayRef> {
+    if args.is_empty() || args.len() > 3 {

Review Comment:
   Checking input arguments validity in public methods is good practice imho.
   
   But the comment above was mostly to thinking on having a generic approach to 
return a friendly message to the user about what is wrong and what is the next 
step. Now we usually saying the input arguments has to be 1, 2, 3 arguments but 
it is mostly meaningless, we can probably improve it with more detailed message



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to