viirya opened a new pull request, #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-comet/pull/69
## Which issue does this PR close?
<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123`
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
-->
Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in
the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
Comet native execution's scan is not started from native but from JVM. Thus
Comet scan is push-based instead of pull-based. Although we pull next input
batches from child operator in JVM, this new input is not pulled from native
but pushed from JVM side.
For an operator like Expand, one input batch can produces multiple output
batches. So we cannot pull next batch directly and push into native without
peeking it. We need to "peek" into native side and see if any more output batch
there. If so, we take it as next output, if not, we pull next input batch and
push into native side to execute on it.
If we pull next input from child operator and push it into native without
peek, new input will be ignored.
Not only we cannot have consistent way to get input for native operators.
The code of input/output to native execution is harder to understand because we
mix push-based and pull-based processing modes. This patch tries to make native
execution fully pull-based.
## What changes are included in this PR?
<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
-->
## How are these changes tested?
<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are
they covered by existing tests)?
-->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]