viirya opened a new pull request, #69:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-comet/pull/69

   ## Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example `Closes #123` 
indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
   -->
   
   Closes #.
   
   ## Rationale for this change
   
   <!--
    Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
    Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.  
   -->
   
   Comet native execution's scan is not started from native but from JVM. Thus 
Comet scan is push-based instead of pull-based. Although we pull next input 
batches from child operator in JVM, this new input is not pulled from native 
but pushed from JVM side.
   
   For an operator like Expand, one input batch can produces multiple output 
batches. So we cannot pull next batch directly and push into native without 
peeking it. We need to "peek" into native side and see if any more output batch 
there. If so, we take it as next output, if not, we pull next input batch and 
push into native side to execute on it.
   
   If we pull next input from child operator and push it into native without 
peek, new input will be ignored.
   
   Not only we cannot have consistent way to get input for native operators. 
The code of input/output to native execution is harder to understand because we 
mix push-based and pull-based processing modes. This patch tries to make native 
execution fully pull-based.
   
   ## What changes are included in this PR?
   
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   ## How are these changes tested?
   
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to