alamb commented on issue #40424: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/40424#issuecomment-1986059224
> Would InfluxDB want to support a client that doesn't recognize the updated prepared statement handle? If not, then as long as it detects and errors when the handle is used, that should be enough. The client would just get the error a bit later. Yes, this is likely what we would do (return an error). One potential issue raised by @erratic-pattern is that it would not be possible to distinguish between the cases: 1. The client is old and doesn't know to send the updated handle 2. The client simply never sent the parameter values I personally think the error could be made clear enough, but I wanted to mention this potential issue -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
