zeroshade commented on code in PR #41180: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41180#discussion_r1566300186
########## docs/source/format/DissociatedIPC.rst: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,333 @@ +.. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +.. or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +.. distributed with this work for additional information +.. regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +.. to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +.. "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +.. with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + +.. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + +.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +.. software distributed under the License is distributed on an +.. "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +.. KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +.. specific language governing permissions and limitations +.. under the License. + +.. _dissociated-ipc: + +======================== +Dissociated IPC Protocol +======================== + +.. warning:: + + Experimental: The Dissociated IPC Protocol is experimental in its current + form. Based on feedback and usage the protocol definition may change until + it is fully standardized. + +Rationale +========= + +The :ref:`Arrow IPC format <format-ipc>` describes a protocol for transferring +Arrow data as a stream of record batches. This protocol expects a continuous +stream of bytes divided into discrete messages (using a length prefix and +continuation indicator). Each discrete message consists of two portions: + +* A `Flatbuffers`_ header message +* A series of bytes consisting of the flattened and packed body buffers (some +message types, like Schema messages, do not have this section) + - This is referred to as the *message body* in the IPC format spec. + +For most cases, the existing IPC format as it currently exists is extremely efficient: + +* Receiving data in the IPC format allows zero-copy utilization of the body +buffer bytes, no deserialization is required to form Arrow Arrays +* An IPC (Feather) file can be memory-mapped because it is location agnostic +and the bytes of the file are exactly what is expected in memory. + +However, there are use cases that aren't handled by this: + +* Constructing the IPC record batch message requires allocating a contiguous +chunk of bytes and copying all of the data buffers into it, packed together +back-to-back. You currently cannot zero-copy **create** IPC messages. +* If the Arrow data is located in a shared-memory location, there is no standard +way to share the handle to the shared-memory across processes or transports that +allow for remote memory accessing. +* Arrow data located on a non-CPU device (such as a GPU) cannot be sent using +Arrow IPC without having to copy the data back to the host device or copying +the flatbuffer metadata bytes into device memory. + - By the same token, receiving IPC messages into device memory would require + performing a copy of the flatbuffer metadata back to the host CPU device. + +This protocol is intended to attempt to solve these use cases in an efficient manner. + +Goals +----- + +* Define a generic protocol for passing Arrow IPC data, not tied to any particular +transport, that also allows for utilizing non-CPU device memory, shared memory, and +newer "high performance" transports such as `ucx`_ or `libfabric`_. +* Allow for using :ref:`Flight RPC <flight-rpc>` purely for control flow by separating +the stream of IPC metadata from IPC body bytes + - This allows for the data in the body to be kept on non-CPU devices (like GPUs) + without expensive Device -> Host copies. + +Definitions +----------- + +.. glossary:: + + IPC Metadata + The flatbuffer message bytes that encompass the header of an Arrow IPC message + + Tag + A ``uint64`` value used as an ID for a message. Specific bits can be masked to + allow identifying messages by only a portion of the tag, leaving the rest of the + bits to be used for control flow or other message metadata. + + Sequence Number + A little-endian, 4-byte unsigned integer starting at 0 for a stream, indicating + the sequence order of messages. It is also used to identify specific messages to + tie the IPC metadata header to its corresponding body since the metadata and body + can be sent across separate pipes/streams/transports. + + If a sequence number reaches ``UINT32_MAX``, it should be allowed to roll over as + it is unlikely there would be enough unprocessed messages waiting to be processed + that would cause an overlap of sequence numbers. + + The sequence number serves two purposes: To identify corresponding metadata and + tagged body data messages and to ensure we do not rely on messages having to arrive + in order. A client should use the sequence number to correctly order messages as + they arrive for processing. + + Backpressure + *Currently* this proposal does not specify any way to manage the backpressure of + messages to throttle for memory and bandwidth reasons. For now, this will be + **transport-defined** rather than lock into something sub-optimal. + + As usage among different transports and libraries grows, common patterns will emerge + that will allow for a generic, but efficient, way to handle backpressure across + different use cases. + + .. note:: + The current usage and examples have been tested using UCX and libfabric transports + so far, but that's all. + + +Protocol Description +==================== + +A reference example implementation utilizing `libcudf`_ and `ucx`_ can be found at +https://github.com/zeroshade/cudf-flight-ucx. + +Requirements +------------ + +A transport implementing this protocol **MUST** provide two pieces of functionality: + +* Message sending + - Delimited messages (like gRPC) as opposed to non-delimited streams (like plain TCP + without further framing). + - Alternatively, a framing mechanism like the `encapsulated message format <ipc-message-format>` + for the IPC protocol can be used while leaving out the body bytes. +* Tagged message sending + - Sending a message that has an attached little-endian, unsigned 64-bit integral tag + for control flow. A tag like this allows control flow to operate on a message whose body + is on a non-CPU device without requiring the message itself to get copied off of the device. + +URI Specification +----------------- + +When providing a URI to a consumer to contact for use with this protocol (such as via +the `Location URI for Flight <flight-location-uris>`), the URI should specify a scheme +like *ucx://* or *fabric://*, that is easily identifiable. In addition, the URI should +encode the following URI query parameters: + +.. note:: + As this protocol matures, this document will get updated with commonly recognized + transport schemes that get used with it. + +* ``want_data`` - **REQUIRED** - uint64 integer value + - This value should be used to tag an initial message to the server to initiate a + data transfer. The body of the initiating message should be an opaque binary identifier + of the data stream being requested (like the ``Ticket`` in the Flight RPC protocol) +* ``free_data`` - **OPTIONAL** - uint64 integer value + - If the server might send messages using offsets / addresses for remote memory accessing + or shared memory locations, the URI should include this parameter. This value is used to + tag messages sent from the client to the data server, containing specific offsets / addresses + which were provided that are no longer required by the client (i.e. any operations that + directly reference those memory locations, such as copying the remote data into local memory, + have been completed). +* ``remote_handle`` - **OPTIONAL** - base64-encoded string + - When working with shared memory or remote memory, this value indicates any required + handle or identifier that is necessary for accessing the memory. + + Using UCX, this would be an *rkey* value + + With CUDA IPC, this would be the value of the base GPU pointer or memory handle, + and subsequent addresses would be offsets from this base pointer. + +Protocol Description +==================== + +There are two possibilities that can occur: + +#. The streams of metadata and body data are across separate connections + +.. figure:: ./DissociatedIPC/SequenceDiagramSeparate.mmd.svg + +#. The streams of metadata and body data are sent simultaneously across the +same connection + +.. figure:: ./DissociatedIPC/SequenceDiagramSame.mmd.svg + +Server Sequence +--------------- + +There can be either a single server handling both the IPC Metadata stream and the +Body data streams, or separate servers for handling the IPC Metadata and the body +data. This allows for streaming of data across either a single transport pipe or +two pipes if desired. + +Metadata Stream Sequence +'''''''''''''''''''''''' + +The standing state of the server is waiting for a **tagged** message with the specified +``<want_data>`` tag value to initiate a transfer. The body of that message will contain an +opaque, binary identifier to indicate a particular dataset / data stream to send. + +.. note:: + + For instance, the **ticket** that was passed with a *FlightInfo* message would be + the body of this message. Because it is opaque, it can be anything the server wants + to use. The URI and identifier do not need to be given to the client via Flight RPC, + but could come across from any transport or protocol desired. + +Upon receiving a ``<want_data>`` request, the server *should* respond by sending a stream +of messages consisting of the following: + +* A 5-byte prefix + - The first byte of the message indicates the type of message, currently there are only + two allowed message types (more types may get added in the future): + 0) End of Stream + 1) Flatbuffer IPC Metadata Message + - the next 4-bytes are a little-endian, 32-bit integer indicating the sequence number of + the message. The first message in the stream (**MUST** always be a schema message) **MUST** + have a sequence number of ``0``. Each subsequent message **MUST** increment the number by + ``1``. +* The full Flatbuffer bytes of an Arrow IPC header + +After sending the last metadata message, the server **MUST** indicate the end of the stream +by sending a message consisting of **exactly** 5 bytes: + +* The first byte is ``0``, indicating an **End of Stream** message +* The last 4 bytes are the sequence number (4-byte, unsigned integer in little-endian byte order) + +Data Stream Sequence +'''''''''''''''''''' + +If a single server is handling both the data and metadata streams, then the data messages +**should** begin being sent to the client in parallel with the metadata messages. Otherwise, +as with the metadata sequence, the standing state of the server is to wait for a **tagged** +message with the ``<want_data>`` tag value, whose body indicates the dataset / data stream +to send to the client. + +For each IPC message in the stream of data, a **tagged** message **MUST** be sent on the data +stream if that message has a body (i.e. a Record Batch or Dictionary message). The +:term:`tag <Tag>` for each message should be structured as follows: + +* The *least significant* 4-bytes (bits 0 - 31) of the tag should be the 32-bit, little-endian sequence +number of the message. +* The *most significant* byte (bits 56 - 63) of the tag indicates the message body **type** as an 8-bit +unsigned integer. Currently only two message types are specified, but more can be added as +needed to expand the protocol: + 0) The body contains the raw body buffer bytes as a packed buffer (i.e. the standard IPC + format body bytes) + 1) The body contains a series of unsigned, little-endian 64-bit integer pairs to represent + either shared or remote memory, schematically structured as + - The first two integers (e.g. the first 16 bytes) represent the *total* size (in bytes) + of all buffers and the number of buffers in this message (and thus the number of following + pairs of ``uint64``) + - Each subsequent pair of ``uint64`` values are an address/offset followed the length of + that particular buffer. +* All unspecified bits (bits 32 - 55) of the tag are *reserved* for future use by potential updates +to this protocol. For now they **MUST** be 0. + +.. note:: + + Any shared/remote memory addresses that are sent across **MUST** be kept alive by the server + until a corresponding tagged ``<free_data>`` message is received. If the client disconnects + before sending any ``<free_data>`` messages, it can be assumed to be safe to clean up the memory + if desired by the server. + +After sending the last tagged IPC body message, the server should maintain the connection and wait +for tagged ``<free_data>`` messages. The structure of these ``<free_data>`` messages is simple: +1 or more unsigned, little-endian 64-bit integers which indicate the addresses/offsets that can +be freed. + +Once there are no more outstanding addresses to be freed, the work for this connection is complete. + +Client Sequence +--------------- + +A client for this protocol needs to asynchronously handle both the data and metadata streams of +messages which may either both come from the same server or different servers. Below is a flowchart +showing how a client might handle the metadata and data streams: + +.. figure:: ./DissociatedIPC/ClientFlowchart.mmd.svg + +#. First the client sends a tagged message using the ``<want_data>`` value it was provided in the +URI as the tag, and the opaque ID as the body. + * If the metadata and data servers are separate, then a ``<want_data>`` message needs to be sent + separately to each. + * In either scenario, the metadata and data streams can be processed concurrently and/or asynchronously + depending on the nature of the transports. +#. For each **untagged** message the client receives in the metadata stream: Review Comment: That would follow the pattern of separate transports / streams for the data and metadata, which would have had two URIs (one for each). The gRPC delimited, untagged messages would be the metadata messages as described, while UCX would send the tagged data messages. I guess for gRPC/HTTP you could consider the endpoint like a tag? you'd have a gRPC definition like: `rpc WantData(Ticket) returns (stream Metadata) {}` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
