lidavidm commented on PR #41823: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41823#issuecomment-2136275980
> Is there any desire to include any other information that the producer has available? If some future Parquet standard allows for extension types it might make sense for the Parquet reader to pass on the extension metadata somehow (or maybe that should only be considered when the feature is first requested, which might be never?) In that case, wouldn't it just get mapped as a different extension type? I suppose I can see this being used as a generic "Parquet gave an extension type that I don't know how to deal with". I think we can add a new field at that point. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
