alamb commented on PR #6236: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/6236#issuecomment-2287098248
> > One reason would be that you already use openDAL in your project > > Right my question was why you would not use object_store_opendal with the first-party support for object_store. As it stands we're now linking to two different ways to achieve the same end, use parquet with opendal, and this seems perhaps redundant? If I were a user without knowledge of how parquet / object_store / arrow-rs / open_dal were all connected, I think it would be simpler for me to pattern match: "I use opendal in my system. I want to read parquet from opendal. Thus I should use parquet_opendal" Otherwise I have to know to use a level of indirection "I should use object_store_opendal to adapt my opendal data source to an ObjectStore and then use parquet" What I think actually makes more sense is to avoid the "first party" distinction somehow -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
