h-vetinari commented on issue #35587:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35587#issuecomment-2295830097

   Update for arrow 17.0:
   
   ## linux-64
   
   ```
   The following tests FAILED:
         36 - arrow-utility-test (Failed)
         71 - arrow-gcsfs-test (Failed)
         73 - arrow-s3fs-test (Failed)
   ```
   
   ## osx-64
   
   ```
   The following tests FAILED:
         71 - arrow-gcsfs-test (Failed)
         73 - arrow-s3fs-test (Failed)
   ```
   
   ## win-64
   
   passes 🥳 
   
   ---------
   
   I got rid of the failures in `azurefs` by installing azurite before running 
the test suite; aside from that, the remaining failures are pretty much the 
same as before - `gcsfs-test` fails because we don't have `testbench`, and s3fs 
expects _more_ failures than it's getting, e.g.
   ```
   Expected 'fs->CopyFile("AB/abc", "def/mno")' to fail with IOError, but got OK
   ```
   specifically
   ```
   [  FAILED  ] 4 tests, listed below:
   [  FAILED  ] TestS3FS.CreateDir
   [  FAILED  ] TestS3FSGeneric.CreateDir
   [  FAILED  ] TestS3FSGeneric.MoveFile
   [  FAILED  ] TestS3FSGeneric.CopyFile
   ```
   The remaining error (linux-only) in `utility-test` is
   ```
   [ RUN      ] TimestampParser.StrptimeZoneOffset
   $SRC_DIR/cpp/src/arrow/util/value_parsing_test.cc:852: Failure
   Expected equality of these values:
     expected
       Which is: 1514769420
     converted
       Which is: 1514769408
   Google Test trace:
   $SRC_DIR/cpp/src/arrow/util/value_parsing_test.cc:847: 2018-01-01 
00:00:00-0117
   
   [  FAILED  ] TimestampParser.StrptimeZoneOffset (0 ms)
   ```
   which feels like a corner case as well.
   
   All in all, I think we're getting kinda close in activating this in the 
feedstock. Any thoughts on that? @kou @pitrou @raulcd @assignUser 
@jorisvandenbossche 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to