amol- commented on code in PR #44126:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44126#discussion_r1769567749
##########
python/pyarrow/table.pxi:
##########
@@ -6259,6 +6259,56 @@ def concat_tables(tables, MemoryPool memory_pool=None,
str promote_options="none
return pyarrow_wrap_table(c_result_table)
+def concat_recordbatches(recordbatches, MemoryPool memory_pool=None):
Review Comment:
We could also go for `concat_batches` in the end the apis have
`from_batches` and `to_batches`. The naming seems to be obvious enough that it
won't confuse users if we just use "batches" and it would be more convenient to
write than `concat_record_batches`.
Any opinion on this one?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
