westonpace commented on a change in pull request #9533: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9533#discussion_r592565500
########## File path: cpp/src/arrow/util/async_generator.h ########## @@ -177,6 +179,94 @@ class TransformingGenerator { std::shared_ptr<TransformingGeneratorState> state_; }; +template <typename T> +class SerialReadaheadGenerator { + public: + SerialReadaheadGenerator(AsyncGenerator<T> source_generator, int max_readahead) + : state_(std::make_shared<State>(std::move(source_generator), max_readahead)) {} + + Future<T> operator()() { + if (state_->first) { + // Lazy generator, need to wait for the first ask to prime the pump + state_->first = false; + auto next = state_->source(); + return next.Then(Callback{state_}); + } + + // This generator is not async-reentrant. We won't be called until the last + // future finished so we know there is something in the queue + auto finished = state_->finished.load(); + if (finished && state_->readahead_queue.IsEmpty()) { + return Future<T>::MakeFinished(IterationTraits<T>::End()); + } + + auto next_ptr = state_->readahead_queue.FrontPtr(); + auto next = std::move(**next_ptr); + state_->readahead_queue.PopFront(); + + auto last_available = state_->spaces_available.fetch_add(1); + if (last_available == 0 && !finished) { + // Reader idled out, we need to restart it + ARROW_RETURN_NOT_OK(state_->Pump(state_)); + } + return next; + } + + private: + struct State { + State(AsyncGenerator<T> source_, int max_readahead) + : first(true), + source(std::move(source_)), + finished(false), + spaces_available(max_readahead), + readahead_queue(max_readahead) {} + + Status Pump(const std::shared_ptr<State>& self) { + // Can't do readahead_queue.write(source().Then(Callback{self})) because then the + // callback might run immediately and add itself to the queue before this gets added + // to the queue messing up the order + auto next_slot = std::make_shared<Future<T>>(); + auto written = readahead_queue.Write(next_slot); + if (!written) { + return Status::UnknownError("Could not write to readahead_queue"); + } + *next_slot = source().Then(Callback{self}); Review comment: I'm technically not mutating anything the queue accesses so it should be safe. It is possible for the reader to pull many times between the `Write` call and `*next_slot = ...` but it is not possible for it to read the item being written. We don't have to worry about the case where `Pump` is called by the reader becuase the reader is never pulled in a sync-reentrant manner (no async generators are) so in that case it isn't possible. However, while a callback is being filled the reader could be polled many times. Let's call the callback being filled the callback for future X. It will be creating future X+1 (not X+N because this is serial readahead) and adding it to the queue. The reader cannot poll for future X+1 until it finishes processing all callbacks for future X (this is why it is important to use future.Then here and not future.AddCallback). This is because this generator is never pulled async-reentrantly. So the reader cannot poll for future X+1 until this callback is finished completely. So it would be impossible to access the item written to the queue until we have had a chance to populate it. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org