Dandandan commented on PR #6668:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/6668#issuecomment-2450763032

   > I'm not sure that 5% really justifies an additional dependency, especially 
one that uses so much unsafe...
   
   Hm yeah wondering about that.
   
   I think that 5% speed up for Parquet might be quite valuable though, given 
that it often translates in close to 5% faster query execution for queries 
where Parquet scan is a bottleneck (quite some DF benchmarks actually involving 
string data).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to