scovich commented on issue #6522: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/6522#issuecomment-2484114281
> Do we need to duplicate the changes, which are implemented in https://github.com/delta-io/delta-kernel-rs/pull/373/files in the arrow-rs, along with num_buffered_rows has_partial_record functions ? Good question. We're happy to tweak the delta-kernel-rs code to match a new arrow-rust API, as long the new API covers the use case. I tried to factor that out in the "details" sections of this issue description. If you refer to the [parse_json_impl](https://github.com/delta-io/delta-kernel-rs/pull/373/files#diff-7ec8be3b8766cb94b7eaaa4e33f07f6be072472c45b0a5c95344913c98cdf2d8R789) method in that PR, it corresponds to my comment in this issue's description: > It would be even nicer if the `parse_json` method could just become part of either arrow-json or arrow-compute, if parsing strings to JSON is deemed a general operation that deserves its own API call. Seems like the low-level support can go independently of the decision to expose a new public `parse_json` method in arrow-compute or arrow-json? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
