cyb70289 commented on a change in pull request #9720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9720#discussion_r595724278
##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/testing/gtest_util.cc
##########
@@ -719,43 +719,44 @@ ExtensionTypeGuard::~ExtensionTypeGuard() {
}
}
-class GatingTask::Impl {
+class GatingTask::Impl : public std::enable_shared_from_this<GatingTask::Impl>
{
public:
explicit Impl(double timeout_seconds)
: timeout_seconds_(timeout_seconds), status_(), unlocked_(false) {}
~Impl() {
- std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(mx_);
- if (!finished_cv_.wait_for(
- lk, std::chrono::nanoseconds(static_cast<int64_t>(timeout_seconds_
* 1e9)),
- [this] { return num_finished_ == num_launched_; })) {
+ if (num_running_ != num_launched_) {
ADD_FAILURE()
- << "A GatingTask instance was destroyed but the underlying tasks did
not "
+ << "A GatingTask instance was destroyed but some underlying tasks
did not "
+ "start running"
+ << std::endl;
+ } else if (num_finished_ != num_launched_) {
+ ADD_FAILURE()
+ << "A GatingTask instance was destroyed but some underlying tasks
did not "
"finish running"
<< std::endl;
}
}
std::function<void()> Task() {
num_launched_++;
Review comment:
Not related to this patch.
Just wondering if Task() may be called in parallel, as `num_launched_` is
not an atomic variable.
@westonpace
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
