tv42 commented on issue #4840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/4840#issuecomment-2522247612

   I just lost an hour to this. The current API is miserable, and relying on 
users to notice the caveat about physical null in the docs **under the prefix 
"Note: For performance reasons"** will not work. You've documented correctness 
in a subsection about performance! Conflating what is stored with what it means 
is a huge logical error.
   
   https://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-03-30.html
   
   (Also, 
https://docs.rs/arrow/latest/arrow/datatypes/enum.DataType.html#method.is_null 
is also a miserable method name using a *third* definition of what "null" 
means.)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to