zanmato1984 commented on issue #44513: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/44513#issuecomment-2597794917
> Was facing a similar issue with `small.join(big, join_type="left outer")`, which was resolved with `big.join(small, join_type="right outer")`. Why was this the first suggestion to try to address the issue here? I would have assumed that these produce the same results. Thanks :) Hi @ivakru , this was merely a workaround to avoid some bug that only appears in the case of join side table being too big. And it shouldn't be considered "addressing the issue". I've came up with a fix #45108 of the underlying bug. Thank you. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
