jonkeane commented on code in PR #45507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/45507#discussion_r1956204397
##########
dev/tasks/r/github.linux.arrow.version.back.compat.yml:
##########
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ jobs:
- { old_arrow_version: '1.0.1', r: '4.0' }
env:
ARROW_R_DEV: "TRUE"
- RSPM: "https://packagemanager.rstudio.com/cran/__linux__/focal/latest";
+ RSPM: "https://packagemanager.rstudio.com/cran/__linux__/jammy/latest";
Review Comment:
> it may be better that we do this backward compatibility test in C++ not
R...
Yeah, totally. There are some R-specific pieces of metadata that it's nice
to test, but if we did have c++ compatibility testing for the underlying
parquet implementation, the decision to drop 1.0.1 - 5.0.0 testing for R does
become less of a worry (yes, the R-specific metadata _might_ not work, but
that's also not _so catastrophic_)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
