jonkeane commented on code in PR #46619:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46619#discussion_r2112017178
##########
r/data-raw/docgen.R:
##########
@@ -149,6 +149,10 @@ tidyselect <- grep("^tidyselect::",
readLines("R/reexports-tidyselect.R"), value
# HACK: remove the _random_along UDF we're using (fix in ARROW-17974)
docs[["_random_along"]] <- NULL
+# TODO - update the script to add this back in - will fail CI as tries to link
+# to non-existent function as arrow::one only exists as registered binding
+docs[["arrow::one"]] <- NULL
+
Review Comment:
Do we need to do this now? Or is this a thing for later? If later, do we
have an issue for it? I'm not sure I fully get what the comment is saying (but
will admit I haven't dug too much right now)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
