conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #46274: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46274#issuecomment-2933484744
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 63c2efef576392d599ea444adcf75731cac44ebc. There were 76 benchmark results with an error: - Commit Run on `arm64-t4g-2xlarge-linux` at [2025-06-02 22:38:21Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/765ac8bb16b14556bab4dfa3c28692de...cc11e5137773400283a0b4761dcc1f5e/) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-07, scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0683e2819471776980008ddf3db3883f) - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-09, scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0683e28cf79e74438000b47af35a62cf) - and 74 more (see the report linked below) There was 1 benchmark result indicating a performance regression: - Commit Run on `amd64-m5-4xlarge-linux` at [2025-06-02 23:44:26Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/170c62547b6f4638a299ba265f30d520...0ac661ccb0484c5cb812a229a053fb91/) - [`partitioned-dataset-filter` (R) with dataset=dataset-taxi-parquet, language=R, query=vignette](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/0683e131a662723a80007560f717ca15...0683e512a50070aa8000380c0299bdec) The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/43357585248) has more details. It also includes information about 20 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
