conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #46783:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/46783#issuecomment-2965773464

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have 
been run so far on merge-commit 66cba4ec5424f50fd61b7d6e9fa9032befe8d1e5.
   
   There were 71 benchmark results with an error:
   
   - Commit Run on `arm64-t4g-2xlarge-linux` at [2025-06-12 
02:23:58Z](https://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/8fa2e4b92131499f9c85c9cb69bf52da...694f3d6ba61d43f59552076ffd16a7f9/)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=parquet, language=R, 
memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-07, 
scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0684a4cf64e77aec8000a73055f0fb0e)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, 
memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-09, 
scale_factor=1](https://conbench.ursa.dev/benchmark-results/0684a4dac05a71d78000b625ee31b753)
   - and 69 more (see the report linked below)
   
   There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/43956994420) 
has more details. It also includes information about 11 possible false 
positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to