xhochy commented on pull request #9923: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9923#issuecomment-815652716
> Note that I have a large undertaking for crossbow #9913 which I plan to merge today, so expect for some minor conflicts. I don't see any conflicting things here, so I would hope that a rebase here will work out fine. Thanks for the heads-up 👍 > @xhochy Just an idea: could we `clone` the upstream conda-forge repository in the crossbow task instead of vendoring the files? We would need to vendor a couple of fines to enable us introducing modifying dependencies, but this approach could help to keep the setup in sync with the feedstock. Yes, that could be part of a future solution. I'm currently struggling a bit with it though as the number of possible conda configurations varies on conda-forge and the names of the files in `.ci_support` changes quite often. Furthermore, it would be nice to have a `libarrow` recipe that is the base for both the Python and R packages but doesn't depend on Python. This would need a bit more of a restructuring inside the arrow codebase. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
