lhoestq commented on issue #44900: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/44900#issuecomment-3001151559
I see. IMO it risks to be a rewriting of the same logic as in the fsspec implementation, and to be a source of potential feature differences in the future (e.g. if there is a xet update that enables better perf). Btw I checked `FSSpecHandler` a bit and the only performance point I can see is about `open_input_stream` which doesn't pass `block_size=0` while I believe it doesn't need to get a seekable file, and this can provide faster downloads (e.g. in [fsspec httpfs ](https://github.com/fsspec/filesystem_spec/blob/ebe56d0b017df94226cc6d8a3c45eadfa9e6105b/fsspec/implementations/http.py#L382)) - I may create a separate issue on this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
