ch-sc commented on a change in pull request #9965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9965#discussion_r610591851



##########
File path: rust/arrow/src/compute/kernels/boolean.rs
##########
@@ -52,37 +51,16 @@ where
 
     // length and offset of boolean array is measured in bits
     let len = left.len();
-    let left_offset = left.offset();
-    let right_offset = right.offset();
-
-    let left_buffer = left.values();
-    let right_buffer = right.values();
-
-    // If we do not have a validity bitmap, we just use an empty buffer
-    let (left_validity, left_validity_len) = 
left.data_ref().null_buffer().map_or_else(
-        || (Buffer::from_iter(iter::empty::<bool>()), 0),
-        |buffer| (buffer.clone(), len),
-    );
-    let (right_validity, right_validity_len) =
-        right.data_ref().null_buffer().map_or_else(
-            || (Buffer::from_iter(iter::empty::<bool>()), 0),
-            |buffer| (buffer.clone(), len),
-        );
-
-    let left_chunks = left_buffer.bit_chunks(left_offset, len);
-    let left_valid_chunks = left_validity.bit_chunks(left_offset, 
left_validity_len);
-    let right_chunks = right_buffer.bit_chunks(right_offset, len);
-    let right_valid_chunks = right_validity.bit_chunks(right_offset, 
right_validity_len);
 
     // result length measured in bytes (incl. remainder)
     let mut result_len = round_upto_multiple_of_64(len) / 8;
-    // if remainder is absent, the kleene_op code would always resize the 
result buffers,
-    // which is both unnecessary and expensive. We can prevent the resizing by 
always
-    // adding 8 additional bytes to the length of both buffers. All bits of 
these 8 bytes
-    // will always be 0 though.
-    if left_chunks.remainder_len().is_zero() {
+    // if remainder is absent, the kleene_op code would resize the result 
buffers, which
+    // is both unnecessary and expensive. We can prevent the resizing by 
adding 8 bytes
+    // to the length of both buffers. All bits of these 8 bytes will be always 
0 though.

Review comment:
       Thanks @alamb. The comment refers to what is happening in the 
`kleene_op` closure and is not related to the bug. I just had the feeling the 
comment needs some refrasing.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to